Model comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B #160 (Estimated); LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B; 3 to LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B only
- 6
- LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0 input / $0 output | LFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B60 tok/s | LFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.84 s | LFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B128K | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract128K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 37.6% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCRSource | 9.7% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge3 benchmarks
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 22.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract today?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.