Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MiniMax M3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.42/100
Margin
27.4pts
winning →
MiniMax
69.8/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B unranked; MiniMax M3 #18

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B estimated; MiniMax M3 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MiniMax M3 share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B; 39 to MiniMax M3.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
6
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B only
0
MiniMax M3 only
39
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MiniMax M3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiniMax M3 is priced at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. MiniMax M3 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MiniMax M3
CategoryDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BΔMiniMax M3
AgenticDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M372.3
CodingDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M372.2
MathDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M385.7
MultimodalDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M364.9

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0 input / $0 outputMiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 outputDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B60 tok/sMiniMax M3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.84 sMiniMax M3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B128KMiniMax M31MMiniMax M3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 66%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 83.5%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 70.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.2%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 74.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 35.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 88.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 44.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1395Not comparable
GDPval rubricsSource 74.7%Not comparable
BankerToolBenchSource 76.1%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 19.8%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 4.6%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1110Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 32.1%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 6.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
AA-SciCodeSource 37.6%45.4%MiniMax M3 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 59%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 66.0%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 42.1%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 42.4%Not comparable
VIBE V2Source 50.1%Not comparable
SVG-BenchSource 63.7%Not comparable
KernelBench HardSource 28.8%Not comparable
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source 65.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
AA-LCRSource 9.7%74.0%MiniMax M3 leads
CritPtSource 3.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.0%44.4%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 61.5%92.9%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-HLESource 5.5%37.1%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 1.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 16.1%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
USAMO 2026Source 85.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
OfficeQA ProSource 45.1%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source 91.6%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 78.1%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 84.6%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 85.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1294Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 22.9%82.9%MiniMax M3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MiniMax M3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MiniMax M3 today?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M3: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.