Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.42/100
Margin
8.3pts
winning →
50.76/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B estimated; Step 3.7 Flash estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Step 3.7 Flash share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B; 24 to Step 3.7 Flash.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
6
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B only
0
Step 3.7 Flash only
24
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Step 3.7 Flash is priced at $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Step 3.7 Flash
CategoryDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BΔStep 3.7 Flash
AgenticDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapStep 3.7 Flash66.4
CodingDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapStep 3.7 Flash56.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0 input / $0 outputStep 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 outputDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B60 tok/sStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.84 sStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B128KStep 3.7 Flash256KStep 3.7 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.5%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 75.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 92.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 25.9%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 49.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 67.1%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 47.2%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 51.57%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 98.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1017Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 14.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-SciCodeSource 37.6%40.0%Step 3.7 Flash leads
SWE-bench ProSource 56.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 39.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 35.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-LCRSource 9.7%63.7%Step 3.7 Flash leads
CritPtSource 2.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.0%30.3%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 61.5%80.9%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-HLESource 5.5%19.9%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -37.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
SimpleVQASource 79.2%Not comparable
V*Source 95.3%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1218Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 22.9%67.3%Step 3.7 Flash leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Step 3.7 Flash today?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.