Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
51.55/100
Margin
10.3pts
← winning
41.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek-R1 supported; LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and LFM2.5-8B-A1B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 6 to LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
DeepSeek-R1 only
0
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and LFM2.5-8B-A1B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek-R1 is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek-R1 and LFM2.5-8B-A1B
CategoryDeepSeek-R1ΔLFM2.5-8B-A1B
MathDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek-R1Not availableLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek-R1Not availableLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek-R1128KLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.5%16.1%DeepSeek-R1 leads
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 15.9%4.5%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.3%7.8%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-LCRSource 54.7%0.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
CritPtSource 1.4%0.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.1%8.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.3%51.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-HLESource 14.9%6.9%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.1%-33.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.0%9.4%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%47.0%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1LFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.6%55.6%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and LFM2.5-8B-A1B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and LFM2.5-8B-A1B today?

DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek-R1
API / mo$2,055
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even583M/day
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.