Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek-R1 #103 (Supported); MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and MiMo-V2-Flash share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 8 to MiMo-V2-Flash.
Updated July 20, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- DeepSeek-R1 only
- 0
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and MiMo-V2-Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
DeepSeek-R1 is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. MiMo-V2-Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek-R1 | Δ | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | DeepSeek-R1Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 |
| Knowledge | DeepSeek-R1Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek-R1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 output | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek-R1Not available | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek-R1Not available | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek-R1128K | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | MiMo-V2-Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 20.1% | 24.7% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 81.3% | 65.6% | DeepSeek-R1 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 14.9% | 8.0% | DeepSeek-R1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -27.1% | -48.5% | DeepSeek-R1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 31.0% | 15.2% | DeepSeek-R1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 84.0% | 75.1% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| GPQASource | — | 83.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 84.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 39.6% | 39.9% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and MiMo-V2-Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and MiMo-V2-Flash today?
DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2-Flash: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.