Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
51.67/100
Margin
9.9pts
← winning
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek-R1 #103 (Supported); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and Mistral Large 2 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 0 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
DeepSeek-R1 only
0
Mistral Large 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 outputMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek-R1Not availableMistral Large 238 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek-R1Not availableMistral Large 21.45 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek-R1128KMistral Large 2128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.5%30.7%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 40.3%29.2%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 54.7%5.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
CritPtSource 1.4%0.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.1%9.2%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.3%48.6%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-HLESource 14.9%4.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.1%-34.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.0%20.1%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%67.8%Mistral Large 2 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Mistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 39.6%31.2%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and Mistral Large 2 today?

DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek-R1
API / mo$2,055
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even583M/day
Mistral Large 2
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.