Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
51.55/100
Margin
8.5pts
winning →
60/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek-R1 unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek-R1 supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 27 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
DeepSeek-R1 only
0
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
27
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek-R1 is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryDeepSeek-R1ΔNemotron 3 Ultra
AgenticDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra51.3
CodingDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra58.3
ReasoningDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
KnowledgeDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra54.2
MultilingualDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek-R1Not availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek-R1Not availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek-R1128KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.5%83.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 15.9%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.3%39.9%DeepSeek-R1 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 54.7%67.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 1.4%3.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.1%37.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.3%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 14.9%26.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.1%-0.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.0%21.6%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%28.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQASource 87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.6%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?

DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek-R1
API / mo$2,055
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even583M/day
Nemotron 3 Ultra
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.