Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek-R1
33
Step 3.7 Flash
72
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
DeepSeek-R1
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.55 / $2.19
$0.2 / $1.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
256K
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
DeepSeek-R1 is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.7 Flash. Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.