Model comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) #97 (Supported); GPT-5.4 #8 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.4 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning); 40 to GPT-5.4.
Updated July 20, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) only
- 0
- GPT-5.4 only
- 40
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.4 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GPT-5.4 is priced at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning). GPT-5.4 has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning).
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Δ | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.477.2 |
| Coding | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.457.7 |
| Knowledge | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.457.6 |
| Math | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.442.5 |
| Multimodal | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.473.2 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 output | GPT-5.4$2.5 input / $15 output | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not available | GPT-5.474 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not available | GPT-5.4151.79 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)128K | GPT-5.41.05M | GPT-5.4 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 37.4% | 87.1% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 75.1% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 82.7% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 75% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 70.6% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 54.6% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 60.3% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 73.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 41.1% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 33.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 44.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1395 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 64.89% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 15.3% | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | — | 38.9% | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | — | 6.0% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 39.1% | 56.6% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | — | 87.5% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 57.7% | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | — | 85.3% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 67.42% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 71.0% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 20.7% | 51.4% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 77.9% | 92.0% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 13.0% | 41.6% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -28.4% | 5.7% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 28.8% | 50.0% | GPT-5.4 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 80.3% | 88.6% | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads |
| GPQASource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 52.1% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 39.8% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 40.1% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | — | 59.6% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | — | 48.1% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1155 | 1252 | GPT-5.4 leads |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 81.2% | Not comparable |
| OfficeQA ProSource | — | 53.2% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 82.8% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 65.4% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 61.1% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | — | 41.0% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.4% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 41.5% | 73.9% | GPT-5.4 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.4 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.4 today?
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.4: $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.