Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.43/100
Margin
29.9pts
← winning
23.49/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) #97 (Supported); Llama 4 Maverick #191 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Llama 4 Maverick share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning); 6 to Llama 4 Maverick.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
12
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) only
0
Llama 4 Maverick only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Llama 4 Maverick is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Llama 4 Maverick
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)ΔLlama 4 Maverick
MathDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapLlama 4 Maverick0.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableLlama 4 Maverick121 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableLlama 4 Maverick0.95 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)128KLlama 4 Maverick1MLlama 4 Maverick lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 37.4%17.8%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource -16Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-SciCodeSource 39.1%33.1%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 16.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-LCRSource 53.3%46.0%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.0%0.0%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.7%14.3%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 77.9%67.1%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 13.0%4.8%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%-41.8%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 28.8%24.3%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.3%87.3%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.690%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152901DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-IFBenchSource 41.5%43.0%Llama 4 Maverick leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Llama 4 Maverick on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Llama 4 Maverick today?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Maverick
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,610
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.