Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs GPT-4.1 nano

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.4/100
Margin
16.3pts
← winning
41.14/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) #71 (Estimated); GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-4.1 nano share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking); 20 to GPT-4.1 nano.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
1
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) only
1
GPT-4.1 nano only
20
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-4.1 nano is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-4.1 nano
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)ΔGPT-4.1 nano
KnowledgeDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano50.3
MathDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano1.0
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano83.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)$0.55 input / $2.19 outputGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not availableGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not availableGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)128KGPT-4.1 nano1MGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 5.11%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12041003DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)GPT-4.1 nanoResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-4.1 nano on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-4.1 nano today?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking): $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026