DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs Llama 4 Behemoth

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) wins overall with a score of 69 vs 39 (30 point difference).DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

84

Llama 4 Behemoth

45.8

87
MMLU
48
85
GPQA
47
83
SuperGPQA
45
81
OpenBookQA
43

Coding

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

79

Llama 4 Behemoth

40

79
HumanEval
40

Mathematics

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

86

Llama 4 Behemoth

47

87
AIME 2023
48
89
AIME 2024
50
88
AIME 2025
49
83
HMMT Feb 2023
44
85
HMMT Feb 2024
46
84
HMMT Feb 2025
45
86
BRUMO 2025
47

Reasoning

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

82

Llama 4 Behemoth

45

83
SimpleQA
46
81
MuSR
44

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Llama 4 Behemoth?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) scores higher overall with 69 vs 39, a difference of 30 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Llama 4 Behemoth?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 84 vs 45.8.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Llama 4 Behemoth?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in coding with an average score of 79 vs 40.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Llama 4 Behemoth?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in math with an average score of 86 vs 47.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Llama 4 Behemoth?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in reasoning with an average score of 82 vs 45.