Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.88/100
Margin
2.1pts
winning →
60/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) estimated; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking); 38 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
1
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) only
1
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
38
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)ΔNemotron 3 Ultra
AgenticDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra51.3
CodingDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra58.3
ReasoningDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
KnowledgeDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra54.2
MultilingualDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)$0.55 input / $2.19 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)128KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 5.11%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 36.4%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 67.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.1%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
GPQASource 87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12081132DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Nemotron 3 UltraResult
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking): $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.