DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs Qwen2.5-1M

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) wins overall with a score of 69 vs 66 (3 point difference).DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

84

Qwen2.5-1M

81.8

87
MMLU
84
85
GPQA
83
83
SuperGPQA
81
81
OpenBookQA
79

Coding

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

79

Qwen2.5-1M

76

79
HumanEval
76

Mathematics

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

86

Qwen2.5-1M

84

87
AIME 2023
85
89
AIME 2024
87
88
AIME 2025
86
83
HMMT Feb 2023
81
85
HMMT Feb 2024
83
84
HMMT Feb 2025
82
86
BRUMO 2025
84

Reasoning

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

82

Qwen2.5-1M

80

83
SimpleQA
81
81
MuSR
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen2.5-1M?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) scores higher overall with 69 vs 66, a difference of 3 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen2.5-1M?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 84 vs 81.8.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen2.5-1M?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in coding with an average score of 79 vs 76.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen2.5-1M?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in math with an average score of 86 vs 84.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen2.5-1M?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads in reasoning with an average score of 82 vs 80.