Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.4/100
Margin
2.5pts
← winning
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.2 #82 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.2 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.2; 4 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3.2 only
8
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V3.2 is priced at $0.28 input / $0.42 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. DeepSeek V3.2 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2ΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
CodingDeepSeek V3.260.9MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
MathDeepSeek V3.217.1MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.2$0.28 input / $0.42 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.235 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.23.75 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.2128KNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KDeepSeek V3.2 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Claw-EvalSource 40.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 18.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 78.9%40.9%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
Gert LabsSource 29.57%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 484Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
SWE-RebenchSource 60.9%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 71.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.7%29.6%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 14.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 39.0%33.7%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
CritPtSource 0.9%0.9%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.7%14.2%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.1%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
AA-HLESource 10.5%10.2%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -46.7%-51.6%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%17.1%DeepSeek V3.2 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 93.5%82.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 22.100%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.100%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1206Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 49.0%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

DeepSeek V3.2: $0.28 input / $0.42 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.