Skip to main content

DeepSeek V3 vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V3

35

VS

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
39.2vs69.9

+30.7 difference

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3
70vs57.6

+12.4 difference

Inst. Following

DeepSeek V3
86.1vs76.5

+9.6 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V3

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.27 / $1.1

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 59 to 35. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 69.9 against 39.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 37.6% to 69.9%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V3 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 35. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 37.6% and 69.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 39.2. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, DeepSeek V3 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 86.1 versus 76.5. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.