Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
55.3/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked (Not scored); Gemini 3.1 Pro #83 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Gemini 3.1 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base; 47 to Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
24
Gemini 3.1 Pro only
47
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Gemini 3.1 Pro is the better fit if reasoning is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Gemini 3.1 Pro finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Pro$2 input / $12 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Pro109 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Pro29.71 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro Base1MGemini 3.1 Pro1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
Claw-EvalSource —57.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource —69.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —95.6%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —21.4%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —32.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —23.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —965Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —56.87%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —13.3%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —37.5%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —42.2%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —58.9%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —30.3%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource —16.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —53.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —73.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
BigCodeBenchSource 59.2%—Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 76.8%—Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource —82.9%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource —78.9%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource —32.03%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —68.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —58.9%Not comparable
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
BBHSource 87.5%—Not comparable
DROPSource 88.7%—Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 88.0%—Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 81.5%—Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 85.2%—Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 51.5%—Not comparable
ARC-AGI-2Source —77.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —72.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource —17.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
AGIEvalSource 83.1%—Not comparable
MMLUSource 90.1%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 90.8%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 73.5%—Not comparable
MMMLUSource 90.3%—Not comparable
C-EvalSource 93.1%—Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.8%—Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 51.1%—Not comparable
SimpleQASource 55.2%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 53.9%—Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 62.6%—Not comparable
TriviaQASource 85.6%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —94.3%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —45.4%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource —20.6%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source —71.5%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —46.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —94.1%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —44.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —32.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —55.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —49.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
GSM8KSource 92.6%—Not comparable
MATHSource 64.5%—Not comparable
CMathSource 90.9%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source —36.900%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source —16.700%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
MGSMSource 84.4%—Not comparable
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource —93.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
MMMU-ProSource —83.9%Not comparable
CharXivSource —80.2%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.4%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —72.4%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —84.4%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource —29.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —81.3%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —82.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1281Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseGemini 3.1 ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource —77.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Gemini 3.1 Pro are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 51.5. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.