Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
88
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) #3 · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+4.3 difference
Coding
+2.3 difference
Knowledge
+5.1 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Qwen3.7 Max
$1.74 / $3.48
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 88. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 71.2 against 66.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 55.4% to 60.6%. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 88. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 55.4% and 60.6%.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 66.1. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 73.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 69.7. Inside this category, HLE w/ tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.