Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3 70B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro #46 (Supported); Llama 3 70B #112 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 3 70B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro; 0 to Llama 3 70B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek V4 Pro only
- 23
- Llama 3 70B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 3 70B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Llama 3 70B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
DeepSeek V4 Pro is priced at $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 3 70B. DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Llama 3 70B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3 70B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro$0.435 input / $0.87 output | Llama 3 70B$0 input / $0 output | Llama 3 70B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V4 ProNot available | Llama 3 70BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V4 ProNot available | Llama 3 70BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro1M | Llama 3 70B128K | DeepSeek V4 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic6 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Math4 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3 70B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1264 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 3 70B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 3 70B today?
DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens Llama 3 70B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.