Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro
68
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
27
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro #29 · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct unranked
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Coding
+21.6 difference
Knowledge
+8.5 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
$1.74 / $3.48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
128K
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
DeepSeek V4 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 27. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 58.8 against 37.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 72.9% to 40.9%.
DeepSeek V4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.
DeepSeek V4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 27. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 72.9% and 40.9%.
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.4 versus 40.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 58.8 versus 37.2. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.