Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
DeepSeekMath V2
63
2/8 categoriesGemma 4 26B A4B
64
Winner · 2/8 categoriesDeepSeekMath V2· Gemma 4 26B A4B
Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeekMath V2 only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Gemma 4 26B A4B finishes one point ahead overall, 64 to 63. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
Gemma 4 26B A4B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 77.1 against 46.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 44% to 77.1%. DeepSeekMath V2 does hit back in reasoning, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeekMath V2.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | DeepSeekMath V2 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65% | — |
| BrowseComp | 66% | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 61% | — |
| CodingGemma 4 26B A4B wins | ||
| HumanEval | 72% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 45% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 44% | 77.1% |
| SWE-bench Pro | 51% | — |
| Multimodal & GroundedGemma 4 26B A4B wins | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 64% | 73.8% |
| OfficeQA Pro | 73% | — |
| ReasoningDeepSeekMath V2 wins | ||
| MuSR | 75% | — |
| BBH | 86% | 64.8% |
| LongBench v2 | 75% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 72% | 44.1% |
| KnowledgeDeepSeekMath V2 wins | ||
| GPQA | 79% | 82.3% |
| SuperGPQA | 77% | — |
| FrontierScience | 73% | — |
| SimpleQA | 77% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 82.6% |
| HLE | — | 17.2% |
| HLE w/o tools | — | 8.7% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 83% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 87% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 80% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2024 | 82% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 81% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 76% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 78% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 77% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 79% | — |
| MATH-500 | 90% | — |
Gemma 4 26B A4B is ahead overall, 64 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 44% and 77.1%.
DeepSeekMath V2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 56.1. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 46.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeekMath V2 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 44.1. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 68.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.