Skip to main content

Model comparison

Exaone 4.0 1.2B vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

LG AI Research
38.88/100
Margin
33.1pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 1.2B unranked; Inkling #17

BenchAlign evidence: Exaone 4.0 1.2B estimated; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 1.2B and Inkling share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 1.2B; 23 to Inkling.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
9
Exaone 4.0 1.2B only
3
Inkling only
23
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Exaone 4.0 1.2B and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 1.2B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Exaone 4.0 1.2B and Inkling
CategoryExaone 4.0 1.2BΔInkling
AgenticExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling69.4
CodingExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling68.6
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling51.7
MathExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling97.1
MultimodalExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5
Inst. FollowingExaone 4.0 1.2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling79.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensExaone 4.0 1.2B128KInkling1MInkling lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 20.5%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 77.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 32.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 36.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1239Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 836Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 23.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 0.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 7.4%46.1%Inkling leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 52.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%63.3%Inkling leads
CritPtSource 0.0%5.4%Inkling leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 2.8%40.7%Inkling leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.4%87.2%Inkling leads
AA-HLESource 5.8%29.7%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -82.6%2.1%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 4.7%40.0%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 91.5%63.1%Inkling leads
GPQASource 87.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
HLESource 46%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 1.2BInklingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 25.3%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Exaone 4.0 1.2B and Inkling on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Exaone 4.0 1.2B and Inkling today?

Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.