Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
62
Gemma 4 E2B
23
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+27.7 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
Gemma 4 E2B
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
128K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 23. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 54.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 60%.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 23. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 60%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 54.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.