Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
GPT-5.4 nano
61
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.
Knowledge
+28.6 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.4 nano
N/A
$0.2 / $1.25
N/A
191 t/s
N/A
3.64s
128K
400K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 53.2.
GPT-5.4 nano gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 61.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 53.2. GPT-5.4 nano stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.