Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
63
GPT-5.4 nano
60
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.
Knowledge
+28.6 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.4 nano
N/A
$0.2 / $1.25
N/A
191 t/s
N/A
3.64s
128K
400K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 63 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 53.2.
GPT-5.4 nano gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 60.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 53.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.