Exaone 4.0 32B vs Mistral Small 4

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 58.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 66.3%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mistral Small 4 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Mistral Small 4 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mistral Small 4 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
84.8%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Reasoning

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Mistral Small 4

58.9

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
66.3%
Coming soon
GPQA
45.3%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
82.9%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

85.3%
AIME 2025
Coming soon

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Mistral Small 4?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 66.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Mistral Small 4?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 58.9. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.