Model comparison
Exaone 4.0 32B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B #181 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 16 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- Exaone 4.0 32B only
- 0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 16
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 43.32 to 39.57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Exaone 4.0 32B | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Exaone 4.0 32B81.8 | Margin← 5.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Coding | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Multimodal | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Inst. Following | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
MMLU-Pro
KnowledgeA 81.8%B 77.3%Winner: Exaone 4.0 32BΔ 4.5MMLU-Pro: Exaone 4.0 32B scored 81.8%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 77.3%. Exaone 4.0 32B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Exaone 4.0 32B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Exaone 4.0 32B128K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 32B wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 81.8% | 77.3% | Exaone 4.0 32B leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 6.0% | 14.9% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 62.8% | 46.9% | Exaone 4.0 32B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.9% | 5.3% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -62.3% | -56.0% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 10.4% | 14.8% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 81.0% | 83.1% | Exaone 4.0 32B leads |
| GPQASource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 85.3% | 82.1% | Exaone 4.0 32B leads |
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | — | 90.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 53.2% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 43.32 to 39.57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 77.3%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 76.3. Inside this category, AA-GPQA Diamond is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.