Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
66
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
56
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+6.3 difference
Math
+3.2 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
256K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 66 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 75.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 77.3%.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 77.3%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 75.5. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 82.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.