Skip to main content

Exaone 4.0 32B vs o1

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Exaone 4.0 32B

65

VS

o1

58

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8vs75.7

+6.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Exaone 4.0 32B

o1

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$15 / $60

Speed

N/A

98 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

32.29s

Context Window

128K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 75.7.

o1 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or o1?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 58.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or o1?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 75.7. o1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 7, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.