Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 54. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o3-pro gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8
o3-pro
86
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 54.
o3-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 81.8. Exaone 4.0 32B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.