Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
66
Sakana Fugu Ultra
100
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+13.7 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
Sakana Fugu Ultra
N/A
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
1M
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 95.5 against 81.8.
Sakana Fugu Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 66.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 81.8. Exaone 4.0 32B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.