Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
ZAYA1-74B-Preview
58
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-74B-Preview only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+17.5 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
ZAYA1-74B-Preview
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
256K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-74B-Preview only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 64.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 68.1%.
ZAYA1-74B-Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 68.1%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 64.3. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.