Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.6

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.3/100
Margin
0.2pts
← winning
55.12/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Pro #83 (Estimated); GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-4.6 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 33 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Pro; 0 to GLM-4.6.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
14
Gemini 3.1 Pro only
33
GLM-4.6 only
0
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.6 only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 55.3 versus 55.12. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 31.8 against 3.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 36.900% to 3.819%.

GLM-4.6 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.6.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-4.6
CategoryGemini 3.1 ProΔGLM-4.6
MathGemini 3.1 Pro31.8Margin← 28.4GLM-4.63.4
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro77.1MarginNo overlapGLM-4.6Not measured
MultimodalGemini 3.1 Pro82.6MarginNo overlapGLM-4.6Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3.1 ProB · GLM-4.6

  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 36.900%B 3.819%
    Winner: Gemini 3.1 ProΔ 33.1
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 36.900%; GLM-4.6 scored 3.819%. Gemini 3.1 Pro wins this benchmark.

  2. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 16.700%B 2.128%
    Winner: Gemini 3.1 ProΔ 14.6
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 16.700%; GLM-4.6 scored 2.128%. Gemini 3.1 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.1 Pro$2 input / $12 outputGLM-4.6Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.1 Pro109 tok/sGLM-4.6Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.1 Pro29.71 sGLM-4.6Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.1 Pro1MGLM-4.6200KGemini 3.1 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
Claw-EvalSource 57.8%—Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 69.7%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.6%76.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.4%—Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 32.0%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.3%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 965—Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 56.87%—Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 13.3%—Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 37.5%—Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 42.2%—Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 58.9%—Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 30.3%—Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 16.5%—Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 53.8%—Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 73.8%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
LiveCodeBench ProSource 82.9%—Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 78.9%—Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 32.03%3.09%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA Coding IndexSource 68.8%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 58.9%33.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 77.1%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 72.7%26.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
CritPtSource 17.7%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
GPQA-DSource 94.3%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 45.4%—Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 20.6%—Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 71.5%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 46.5%23.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 94.1%63.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 44.7%5.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 32.9%-31.6%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.3%20.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 49.9%66.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
MathGemini 3.1 Pro wins
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 36.900%3.819%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 16.700%2.128%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 93.2%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
MMMU-ProSource 83.9%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 80.2%—Not comparable
ERQASource 69.4%—Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 72.4%—Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 84.4%—Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 29.0%—Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 81.3%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 82.4%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1281—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6Result
AA-IFBenchSource 77.1%36.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 55.3 to 55.12. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 36.900% and 3.819%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 31.8 versus 3.4. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Google Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.