Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Mistral 8x7B v0.2
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Pro #83 (Estimated); Mistral 8x7B v0.2 #178 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 47 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Pro; 0 to Mistral 8x7B v0.2.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Gemini 3.1 Pro only
- 47
- Mistral 8x7B v0.2 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mistral 8x7B v0.2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Mistral 8x7B v0.2. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Mistral 8x7B v0.2.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.1 Pro$2 input / $12 output | Mistral 8x7B v0.2$0 input / $0 output | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.1 Pro109 tok/s | Mistral 8x7B v0.2Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.1 Pro29.71 s | Mistral 8x7B v0.2Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.1 Pro1M | Mistral 8x7B v0.232K | Gemini 3.1 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic16 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | 69.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 21.4% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 32.0% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 23.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 965 | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 56.87% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 13.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 37.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 42.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 58.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 30.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 53.8% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 73.8% | — | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | 94.3% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 45.4% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | 20.6% | — | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | 71.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 46.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 94.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 44.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 32.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 55.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 49.9% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | 93.2% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | 83.9% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 80.2% | — | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | 69.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | 72.4% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | 29.0% | — | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | 81.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 82.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1281 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 77.1% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 today?
Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral 8x7B v0.2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.