Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4o

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
OpenAI
41.49/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); GPT-4o #165 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 4 to GPT-4o.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
9
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
12
GPT-4o only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4o is priced at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GPT-4o.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteΔGPT-4o
AgenticGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4MarginNo overlapGPT-4oNot measured
CodingGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2MarginNo overlapGPT-4oNot measured
ReasoningGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2MarginNo overlapGPT-4oNot measured
MathGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4o0.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 outputGPT-4o$2.5 input / $10 outputGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot availableGPT-4o131 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot availableGPT-4o0.81 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1MGPT-4o128KGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 74%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1140Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 26.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.0%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 634Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 16.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 25.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.0%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.2%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%33.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
MRCRv2Source 72.2%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 62.0%0.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 36.5%11.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 83.8%54.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
AA-HLESource 17.5%3.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 6.9%-10.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 30.3%19.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 33.5%37.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.345%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 79.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 861Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4oResult
AA-IFBenchSource 34.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o today?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens GPT-4o: $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.