Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
Head-to-head evidence from 10 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract share 10 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 5 to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 10
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 11
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
- 5
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 10 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | MarginNo overlap | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured |
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | MarginNo overlap | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 8.5% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 1.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 28.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 5.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | -83.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 5.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 94.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 33.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract today?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Claude Mythos 5
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Claude Opus 4.8
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.4 Pro
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Claude Fable 5
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.