Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 4 to Llama 4 Scout.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 7
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is priced at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 1M for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | Llama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 output | Llama 4 Scout has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | Llama 4 Scout128 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | Llama 4 Scout0.70 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | Llama 4 Scout10M | Llama 4 Scout lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | 90 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | 1.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | 0.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 15.5% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 10.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 58.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 4.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | -52.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 14.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 78.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | — | 0.000% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 39.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout today?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.