Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 6 to MiMo-V2-Flash.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 8
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 6
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; MiMo-V2-Flash is the better fit if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | Margin→ 19.2 | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | 833 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | 12.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | 16.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 83.9% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Flash wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 24.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 65.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 8.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | -48.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 15.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 75.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| GPQASource | — | 83.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 84.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.0% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 39.9% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.