Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

86

VS

GLM-5.2

94

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #11 · GLM-5.2 #9

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.2
77.2vs81

+3.8 difference

Coding

GLM-5.2
54.5vs62.1

+7.6 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
58vs67.2

+9.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GLM-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

$1.4 / $4.4

Speed

284.2 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

18.55s

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 86. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 67.2 against 58. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 40.2% to 54.7%.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5.2. That is roughly 2.0x on output cost alone.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 86. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 40.2% and 54.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 58. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 54.5. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 77.2. Inside this category, Toolathlon is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.