Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

88

VS

GPT-5.2

80

3 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #7 · GPT-5.2 unranked

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.2 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash
77.2vs55.2

+22.0 difference

Coding

GPT-5.2
54.5vs64.7

+10.2 difference

Reasoning

Gemini 3.5 Flash
74.7vs52.9

+21.8 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
58vs92.4

+34.4 difference

Multimodal

Gemini 3.5 Flash
83.8vs80.3

+3.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

$1.75 / $14

Speed

284.2 t/s

73 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

18.55s

130.34s

Context Window

1M

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.2 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 88 to 80. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.2 against 55.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 78.4% to 47.3%. GPT-5.2 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 88 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 78.4% and 47.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 58. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 54.5. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74.7 versus 52.9. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 55.2. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 80.3. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.