Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #33 (Estimated); Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 46 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash; 0 to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Gemini 3.5 Flash only
- 46
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is priced at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4. Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash$1.5 input / $9 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4$0 input / $0 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash284.2 tok/s | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash18.55 s | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash1M | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4262K | Gemini 3.5 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 76.2% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 83.6% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 56.5% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 78.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Finance Agent v2Source | 57.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1349 | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 42.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 37.5% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 47.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 61.85% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 18.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 42.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 50.1% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 40.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 76.2% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 55.1% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | 53.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 48.68% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench31Source | 49.8% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 48.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 70.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 53.1% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning5 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 50.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 92.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 92.7% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 40.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 51.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 60.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 92.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 41.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 22.7% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 today?
Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.