Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs LongCat-2.0

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

86

VS

LongCat-2.0

80

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #11 · LongCat-2.0 unranked

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LongCat-2.0 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash
77.2vs70.8

+6.4 difference

Coding

LongCat-2.0
54.5vs59.5

+5.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

LongCat-2.0

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

$0.75 / $2.95

Speed

284.2 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

18.55s

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LongCat-2.0 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 80. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.2 against 70.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 76.2% to 70.8%. LongCat-2.0 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.75 input / $2.95 output per 1M tokens for LongCat-2.0. That is roughly 3.1x on output cost alone.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or LongCat-2.0?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 76.2% and 70.8%.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or LongCat-2.0?

LongCat-2.0 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 59.5 versus 54.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or LongCat-2.0?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 70.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 30, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.