Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

87

VS

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #9 · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
54.5vs69.9

+15.4 difference

Knowledge

Gemini 3.5 Flash
58vs57.6

+0.4 difference

Inst. Following

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
76.3vs76.5

+0.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

N/A

Speed

284.2 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

18.55s

N/A

Context Window

1M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 58 against 57.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 92.2% to 57.6%. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.2% and 57.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 58 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA-D is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 54.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 76.5 versus 76.3. Gemini 3.5 Flash stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.