Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

87

VS

MiniMax M3

76

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #8 · MiniMax M3 #12

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M3 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash
77.2vs71.9

+5.3 difference

Coding

MiniMax M3
54.5vs67

+12.5 difference

Multimodal

Gemini 3.5 Flash
83.8vs64.9

+18.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

MiniMax M3

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

$0.3 / $1.2

Speed

284.2 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

18.55s

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M3 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 76. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 83.8 against 64.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 76.2% to 66%. MiniMax M3 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M3. That is roughly 7.5x on output cost alone. Gemini 3.5 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 76.2% and 66%.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 67 versus 54.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 71.9. Inside this category, APEX-Agents-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 64.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.