Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
88
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
48
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #7 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B unranked
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+1.0 difference
Knowledge
+17.5 difference
Multimodal
+7.5 difference
Inst. Following
+2.1 difference
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
$1.5 / $9
$0 / $0
284.2 t/s
N/A
18.55s
N/A
1M
256K
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 88 to 48. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 83.8 against 76.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SciCode, 53.1% to 32%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Gemini 3.5 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 88 to 48. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SciCode, where the scores are 53.1% and 32%.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 58. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 54.5 versus 53.5. Inside this category, SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 76.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 74.2. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.