Reasoning
Directional only- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 74.7
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- 60.7
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Pokee-Isaac 28B
Updated August 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
1 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
21 Gemini 3.5 Flash only
1 Shared
6 Pokee-Isaac 28B only
- Shared results
- 1
- Gemini 3.5 Flash only
- 21
- Pokee-Isaac 28B only
- 6
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
1 category uses different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Agentic
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 77.2
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 55.1
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 40.2
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 32.9
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Not measured
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 83.8
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Not measured
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pokee-Isaac 28B | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 74.7 | 60.7 | Directional only2 vs 1 rows | Directional only |
| Agentic | 77.2 | Not measured | Not comparable2 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 55.1 | Not measured | Not comparable1 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | 40.2 | Not measured | Not comparable1 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | 32.9 | Not measured | Not comparable2 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 83.8 | Not measured | Not comparable2 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
MRCRv2
Reasoning
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.3%Pokee-Isaac 28B: 60.7%Normalized gap 16.6Gemini 3.5 Flash source Pokee-Isaac 28B source
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- $0.006
- Fits in one request
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.00065
- Fits in one request
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- $0.102
- Fits in one request
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.0105
- Fits in one request
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- $0.15
- Fits in one request
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.043
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower modeled cost
Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationGemini 3.5 FlashPokee-Isaac 28B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Pokee-Isaac 28B
API model ID
Gemini 3.5 Flash
gemini-3.5-flash
Google Gemini API pricingPokee-Isaac 28B
pokee-isaac
Pokee-Isaac 28B model pageCached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$0.15 per 1M cached input tokens
Google Gemini API pricingPokee-Isaac 28B
Not published
Pokee-Isaac 28B model pageDocumented inputs
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Not sourced
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Not sourced
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Not sourced
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Reasoning
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Reasoning
Weight access
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Proprietary
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Proprietary
License
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Proprietary
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Proprietary
Release date
Gemini 3.5 Flash
2026-05-19
Pokee-Isaac 28B
2026-08-03
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- Repository review: $0.102 vs $0.0105. Cache-heavy agent loop: $0.15 vs $0.043.
- Context tradeoff
- Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented window (10M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence28 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash76.2%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Gemini 3.5 Flash83.6%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Toolathlon
Gemini 3.5 Flash56.5%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Gemini 3.5 Flash78.4%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Finance Agent v2
Gemini 3.5 Flash57.9%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Gert Labs
Gemini 3.5 Flash61.85%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
ResearchClawBench
Gemini 3.5 Flash18.0%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%SourceNot directly comparable
BFCL v4
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B70.9%SourceNot directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B66.2%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP-Atlas claim coverage
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B74.6%SourceNot directly comparable
PinchBench
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B95.7%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash76.2%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash55.1%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Vibe Code Bench
Gemini 3.5 Flash48.68%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
cursorBench31
Gemini 3.5 Flash49.8%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
cursorBench32
Gemini 3.5 Flash48.8%SourcePokee-Isaac 28B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash—Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
Knowledge
Math
Multimodal
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pokee-Isaac 28B?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pokee-Isaac 28B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pokee-Isaac 28B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pokee-Isaac 28B?
For the stated presets, chat costs $0.006 on Gemini 3.5 Flash and $0.00065 on Pokee-Isaac 28B; repository review costs $0.102 and $0.0105; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $0.15 and $0.043. Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pokee-Isaac 28B?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window: 10M, compared with 1M.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 4, 2026
Watch Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Pokee-Isaac 28B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.