Capability
Unranked
field median 57.3
Not eligible for a public rank
Model profile · Pokee AI
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Released Aug 3, 2026 — see all recent releases
Pokee-Isaac 28B is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 7 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Data as of August 4, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #45. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
7 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
$0.15input / $1 output
input median $1
blended $0.57
Speed
Not measured
field median 92 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
10Mtokens
field median 200,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic5/5 verified
- Coding1/1 verified
- Reasoning1/1 verified
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- pokee-isaacPokee-Isaac 28B model page
- Context window
- 10MPokee-Isaac 28B model page
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Pokee serves the proprietary pokee-isaac API model through its OpenAI-compatible Developer API and offers managed, customer-VPC, on-premises, and on-device deployment paths. Pokee has not published the Isaac weights; its terms identify Pokee Isaac as proprietary.
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing recordPokee-Isaac 28B model page
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #45 of 131Percentile 66thWeight 22%5 benchmarksVerified | 50.8 | #45 of 131 | 66th | 22% | 5 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%1 benchmarkVerified | 48.2 | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score65.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 86.6% | Gap21.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic5 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score65.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 86.6% | Gap21.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| BFCL v4Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard v4 | Score70.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 75.0% | Gap4.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| τ³-bench resultsτ³-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | Score66.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Mistral Medium 3.5 128B · 91.4% | Gap25.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MCP-Atlas claim coverageMCP-Atlas mean claim coverage | Score74.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.1% | Gap14.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| PinchBench | Score95.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Pokee-Isaac 28B · 95.7% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Reasoning1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRCRv2 | Score60.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 93.6% | Gap32.9 behind | WeightWeighted 31% | Provider exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Aug 3, 2026 · you are here
Pokee-Isaac 28BNot publicly ranked · $0.15 / $1
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Pokee-Isaac 28B, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Pokee-Isaac 28B is a proprietary model with a 10M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Pokee serves the proprietary pokee-isaac API model through its OpenAI-compatible Developer API and offers managed, customer-VPC, on-premises, and on-device deployment paths. Pokee has not published the Isaac weights; its terms identify Pokee Isaac as proprietary.
Official exact-value snapshot from Pokee AI's August 3, 2026 Pokee-Isaac 28B v0 model page and technical report. BenchLM maps the report's 256K MRCR v2 8-needle result, BFCL v4 overall, four-domain Tau3 text-track average, MCP-Atlas mean claim coverage, Terminal-Bench 2.1 text-only subset, and PinchBench completed-task score to existing exact keys. RULER length sweeps, the remaining MRCR length bins, BFCL component rows, Tau3 domain rows, MCP-Atlas pass counts and turn counts, DTAP security rates, and hardware throughput stay outside the scored fields rather than being collapsed into non-equivalent metrics. Pokee reports a text-only 28B model with a 10M-token context window; some weights were fine-tuned from Qwen3.6-27B, but Isaac itself remains proprietary.
7 of 381 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #45. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Radar
Full release historyPokee-Isaac 28B release history
Pokee-Isaac 28B v0 released
Pokee AI · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does Pokee-Isaac 28B perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has 7 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is Pokee-Isaac 28B good for coding and programming?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Pokee-Isaac 28B good for reasoning and logic?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Pokee-Isaac 28B good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Pokee-Isaac 28B ranks #45 out of 131 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 50.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Does Pokee-Isaac 28B have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Pokee-Isaac 28B currently has 7 source-displayable rows across 381 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Pokee-Isaac 28B?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has a documented context window of 10M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Last updated August 4, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.