Skip to main content

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

87

VS

Step 3.7 Flash

72

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash #8 · Step 3.7 Flash unranked

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Step 3.7 Flash only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash
77.2vs65.9

+11.3 difference

Coding

Step 3.7 Flash
54.5vs56.3

+1.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.5 / $9

$0.2 / $1.15

Speed

284.2 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

18.55s

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Step 3.7 Flash only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.2 against 65.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 76.2% to 59.5%. Step 3.7 Flash does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.7 Flash. That is roughly 7.8x on output cost alone. Gemini 3.5 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Step 3.7 Flash.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 76.2% and 59.5%.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.3 versus 54.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 65.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.