Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
57.96/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.6 Flash unranked (Not scored); Gemma 4 26B A4B #67 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Gemini 3.6 Flash; 6 to Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
14
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
5
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3.6 Flash is priced at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashΔGemma 4 26B A4B
AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash83.0MarginNo overlapGemma 4 26B A4BNot measured
KnowledgeGemini 3.6 FlashNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 26B A4B43.4
MultimodalGemini 3.6 FlashNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 26B A4B73.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 outputGemma 4 26B A4B$0 input / $0 outputGemma 4 26B A4B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.6 Flash1MGemma 4 26B A4B256KGemini 3.6 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 83%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1421761Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 38.7%11.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 46.1%13.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA BriefcaseSource 961Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 24.5%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 77.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 43.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
deepSweSource 49%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 69.2%39.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-SciCodeSource 52.7%40.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
AA-LCRSource 69.7%55.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
CritPtSource 10.6%0.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 50.1%25.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.8%79.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-HLESource 38.3%18.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 23.5%-48.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 50.2%18.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 53.5%80.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
MMLU-ProSource 82.6%Not comparable
HLESource 17.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 8.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 83.2%69.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
MMMU-ProSource 73.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 72.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B today?

Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.