Model comparison
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hy3
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.6 Flash unranked (Not scored); Hy3 #80 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hy3 share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to Gemini 3.6 Flash; 1 to Hy3.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- Gemini 3.6 Flash only
- 6
- Hy3 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hy3 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3.6 Flash is priced at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Δ | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3.6 Flash83.0 | MarginNo overlap | Hy3Not measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Hy3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 output | Hy3$0 input / $0 output | Hy3 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot available | Hy3Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot available | Hy3Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash1M | Hy3256K | Gemini 3.6 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Hy3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1421 | 1214 | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 38.7% | 30.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 46.1% | 35.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 961 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 24.5% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 77.5% | — | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Hy3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 50.1% | 41.2% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 92.8% | 89.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-HLESource | 38.3% | 31.6% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 23.5% | -18.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 50.2% | 31.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 53.5% | 73.0% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hy3 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hy3 today?
Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Hy3: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.