Model comparison
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.6 Flash unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark share 14 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Gemini 3.6 Flash; 25 to Muse Spark.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- Gemini 3.6 Flash only
- 5
- Muse Spark only
- 25
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.6 Flash makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; Muse Spark is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Gemini 3.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Δ | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3.6 Flash83.0 | Margin← 24.0 | Muse Spark59.0 |
| Coding | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark67.8 |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark42.5 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark50.4 |
| Math | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark32.9 |
| Multimodal | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark82.5 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 output | Muse SparkNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot available | Muse SparkNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.6 FlashNot available | Muse SparkNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash1M | Muse Spark262K | Gemini 3.6 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1421 | 1144 | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 38.7% | 28.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 46.1% | 32.2% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 961 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 24.5% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 77.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 59% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 91.5% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 74.8% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 43.5% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| deepSweSource | 49% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 69.2% | 58.6% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 52.7% | 51.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 77.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 52.4% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | — | 80.0% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 19.67% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 50.1% | 43.1% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 92.8% | 88.4% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-HLESource | 38.3% | 39.9% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 23.5% | 4.1% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 50.2% | 44.6% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 53.5% | 73.2% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 89.5% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 50.4% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 42.8% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 42.8% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | — | 52.6% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 83.2% | 80.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash leads |
| CharXivSource | — | 86.4% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 80.4% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 64.7% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 71.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 84.1% | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | — | 33.0% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 78.4% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 75.9% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark?
Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 59. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.