Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
77.44/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.6 Flash unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 share 17 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Gemini 3.6 Flash; 22 to Muse Spark 1.1.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
17
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
2
Muse Spark 1.1 only
22
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.6 Flash makes more sense if agentic is the priority; Muse Spark 1.1 is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashΔMuse Spark 1.1
AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash83.0Margin 2.6Muse Spark 1.180.4
CodingGemini 3.6 FlashNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark 1.161.5
KnowledgeGemini 3.6 FlashNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark 1.162.1
MultimodalGemini 3.6 FlashNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark 1.188.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3.6 FlashB · Muse Spark 1.1
  1. OSWorld-Verified

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 83%B 80.8%
    Winner: Gemini 3.6 FlashΔ 2.2
    OSWorld-Verified: Gemini 3.6 Flash scored 83%; Muse Spark 1.1 scored 80.8%. Gemini 3.6 Flash wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 outputMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.6 Flash1MMuse Spark 1.11MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash wins
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Result
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 83%80.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 14211374Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 38.7%37.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 46.1%43.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA BriefcaseSource 961863Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA Tau3 BankingSource 24.5%25.2%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
aaTerminalBench21Source 77.5%77.9%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 88.1%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 75.6%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 84.9%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 59.0%Not comparable
Finance Agent v2Source 57.2%Not comparable
deepSweSource 53.3%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 14.2%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 54.7%Not comparable
CybenchSource 92.9%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 0.8%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 42.8%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 93.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Result
deepSweSource 49%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 69.2%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 52.7%58.2%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.0%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 61.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Result
AA-LCRSource 69.7%63.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
CritPtSource 10.6%15.1%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
MRCR 1MSource 54.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 50.1%50.6%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.8%89.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-HLESource 38.3%45.1%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 23.5%18.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 50.2%40.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 53.5%38.1%Muse Spark 1.1 leads
HLESource 62.1%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 52.2%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource 59.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 83.2%Not comparable
CharXivSource 88.4%Not comparable
BabyVisionSource 76.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1299Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 80.4. Inside this category, AA Briefcase is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.